---
title: "United States Tax Court Decision for the Week and Gambling Winnings"
type: "post"
published_at: "2017-09-14T23:59:31+00:00"
modified_at: "2017-09-14T23:59:31+00:00"
url: "https://bestirscpa.com/1165-2/"
excerpt: "A recent Tax Court decision was reported that may be of interest to individuals potentially dealing with tax litigation and gambling winnings and standard deduction v. itemized deductions. J. Frank Best, Certified Public Accountant and United States Tax Court Litigator..."
markdown_url: "https://bestirscpa.com/1165-2.md"
---

- Post published:September 14, 2017

A recent Tax Court decision was reported that may be of interest to individuals potentially dealing with tax litigation and gambling winnings and standard deduction v. itemized deductions. J. Frank Best, Certified Public Accountant and United States Tax Court Litigator works to stay current on all IRS decisions concerning tax litigation to ensure we are fully informed and prepared for our clients.

**Taxpayers Who Elected Standard Deduction Can’t Deduct Gambling Losses**

The Tax Court held that a couple was taxable on gambling winnings shown on their Form W-2G and, because the couple could not substantiate how much was spent in producing the winnings, no reduction was allowed. The court also found that the couple’s election to take the standard deduction precluded them from taking an itemized deduction for their gambling losses. Viso v. Comm’r, T.C. Memo. 2017-154.

During 2013, William Viso engaged in a variety of recreational gambling activities: he bet on college and professional sports, played slot machines, and bought lottery tickets. That year, he won $5,060 on slot machines at three different casinos. The gambling winnings were reported on Forms W-2G, Certain Gambling Winnings. That same year, Viso and his wife sustained approximately $7,000 in gambling losses.

On their joint Form 1040, the Visos did not report any gambling winnings or losses for the 2013 tax year. They claimed a standard deduction of $12,200. The IRS assessed a tax deficiency after including the $5,060 of gambling winnings in the couple’s 2013 income.

The Visos did not challenge the accuracy of the gross gambling winnings included in their income; instead they argued that those amounts should be reduced by the amounts of bets they placed to produce their winnings. Although the couple introduced evidence of losses at another casino (in addition to lottery tickets and sporting bets), they produced no evidence as to how much William bet to produce the winnings reflected on the Forms W-2G.

For tax purposes, gambling losses are treated in one of two ways. Taxpayers engaged in the trade or business of gambling may deduct their gambling losses against their gambling winnings “above the line” as a trade or business expense in arriving at adjusted gross income. In the case of taxpayers not engaged in the trade or business of gambling, gambling losses are allowable as an itemized deduction, but only to the extent of gambling winnings.

The Tax Court held that the couple’s election to take the standard deduction precluded them from taking an itemized deduction for their gambling losses. In addition, because they could not substantiate how much was spent in producing the winnings reflected on Forms W-2G, no reduction was allowed. In reaching its conclusion, the court cited Torpie v. Comm’r, T.C. Memo. 2000-168 which held that, in order to claim any Schedule A itemized deductions, a taxpayer must forgo the standard deduction.

The Tax Court noted that the couple’s standard deduction of $12,200 exceeded their potential itemized deduction for gambling losses of $5,060. Thus, the court said, the couple’s election to take the standard deduction resulted in a larger deduction than if they had taken an itemized deduction for their gambling losses. Since the couple elected to take the standard deduction, the court held they could not take an itemized deduction for their gambling losses to offset their gambling winnings.

Tags: [Best IRS CPA](https://bestirscpa.com/tag/best-irs-cpa/),[Gambling Winnings](https://bestirscpa.com/tag/gambling-winnings/),[Gambling Winnings Tax Litigation](https://bestirscpa.com/tag/gambling-winnings-tax-litigation/),[IRS Tax Audits](https://bestirscpa.com/tag/irs-tax-audits/),[Myrtle Beach SC IRS Tax Problems](https://bestirscpa.com/tag/myrtle-beach-sc-irs-tax-problems/)

#### Recent Posts

- [Raleigh, NC| IRS Tax Controversy CPA|Best IRS CPA](https://bestirscpa.com/raleigh-nc-irs-tax-controversy-cpa-best-irs-cpa/)
- [IRS Tax Controversy CPA & Litigation – Raleigh, NC/ J. Frank Best, CPA](https://bestirscpa.com/irs-tax-controversy-cpa-litigation-raleigh-nc-j-frank-best-cpa/)
- [IRS Tax Controversy CPA & Litigation – North Myrtle Beach, SC/ J. Frank Best, CPA](https://bestirscpa.com/irs-tax-controversy-cpa-litigation-north-myrtle-beach-sc-j-frank-best-cpa/)
- [IRS Tax Controversy CPA & Litigation – Myrtle Beach, SC/ J. Frank Best, CPA](https://bestirscpa.com/irs-tax-controversy-cpa-litigation-myrtle-beach-sc-j-frank-best-cpa/)
- [IRS Tax Controversy CPA & Litigation – Wilmington, NC/ J. Frank Best, CPA](https://bestirscpa.com/irs-tax-controversy-cpa-litigation-wilmington-nc-j-frank-best-cpa/)

#### Categories

- [Appeals & Hearings](https://bestirscpa.com/category/appeals-hearings/)
- [Failure to File](https://bestirscpa.com/category/failure-to-file/)
- [Frivolous Argument Penalty](https://bestirscpa.com/category/frivolous-argument-penalty/)
- [Innocent Spouse](https://bestirscpa.com/category/innocent-spouse/)
- [IRS Abuse of Discretion](https://bestirscpa.com/category/irs-abuse-of-discretion/)
- [IRS Collection](https://bestirscpa.com/category/irs-collection/)
- [IRS Penalties](https://bestirscpa.com/category/irs-penalties/)
- [IRS Problems](https://bestirscpa.com/category/irs-problems/)
- [Non-Filers & Delinquent](https://bestirscpa.com/category/non-filers-delinquent/)
- [Tax Audits](https://bestirscpa.com/category/tax-audits/)
- [Trust Fund Recovery Penalty](https://bestirscpa.com/category/irs-abuse-of-discretion/trust-fund-recovery-penalty/)
- [U.S. Tax Court Litigation](https://bestirscpa.com/category/us-tax-court-litigation/)
- [Worker Classifications](https://bestirscpa.com/category/worker-classifications/)

#### Archives

Archives Select Month  April 2020   March 2020   February 2020   January 2020   December 2019   November 2019   October 2019   August 2019   July 2019   May 2019   February 2019   December 2018   November 2018   October 2018   September 2018   August 2018   July 2018   June 2018   April 2018   March 2018   January 2018   December 2017   November 2017   October 2017   September 2017   June 2017   May 2017   April 2017   January 2017   November 2016   October 2016   August 2016   June 2016   May 2016   March 2016   February 2016   January 2016   December 2015   November 2015   September 2015   August 2015   July 2015   June 2015   May 2015   April 2015   March 2015   February 2015   January 2015   December 2014   November 2014   October 2014   September 2014   August 2014   July 2014   June 2014   May 2014   April 2014   March 2014   February 2014   January 2014   December 2013   November 2013   October 2013   September 2013   August 2013   July 2013   June 2013   March 2013

## LLMS
- [llms.txt](https://bestirscpa.com/llms.txt) Markdown text overview for AI agent consumption
- [llms-full.txt](https://bestirscpa.com/llms-full.txt) Complete website text in markdown format for AI agent consumption
